"
Dog, what are you, twelve? You don't actually believe that, do you?
"U really can't be that stupid to think she won it for her acting skills. You likely think all white cops who pull over black drivers aren't racial profiling them. HAHAHA@ignorance! Wake ur common sense the f*ck up boy.
"Repetition of an opinion doesn't make it a fact. We've shown that Perry has some type of color issues due to many of his casting choices. However you have yet to prove that Daniels promotes white supremacy. Does he also have color issues? Maybe. Casting strictly bi-racial heroes in Precious was puzzling. But Daniels' only other directorial effort was the little seen Shadowboxer with Cuba Gooding as the lead. Using Monster's Ball and Tennessee to try to "prove" your claim is weak as Daniels didn't write or direct either film."Um, it's a fact that Lee Daniels promote white supremacy with those racist-ass films. So if a black man produced movies on how wonderful white ppl r, how in the hell IS THAT NOT promoting white supremacy? Also, he did it 3 times.......I prove you wrong 3 times. Also, Shadowboxer had Cuba pair up with a white lady.........another prime example of white supremacy.
"Nobody's saying his films shouldn't have comedic elements in them. Even the most tragedy filled life has light moments. The problem with Perry's films, particularly the ones with Madea or Brown in them, is that the humor is so broad and outrageous that it undercuts the heavy-handed drama of the rest of the film. Take Meet the Browns for instance. In it, he shows us the oldest son getting seduced by the streets and ultimately shot in the back. Then Perry shoehorns all of these slapstick antics of Brown and co. which ultimately dilute the main storyline. His comic relief characters don't fit. It's not like these are characters who get in a humorous line or two. Madea and Brown are full out clowns They're caricatures from stupid sitcoms, not fleshed out, fully realized characters. Perry's trying to jam a round peg into a square hole. A more talented writer/director could maybe make these contradictions work within the narrative, but Perry ain't that dude. LOL!"Not really at all. Madea's Family Reunion had a scene in which Madea was talking to Lisa about her controlling husband. There's no jokes in that scene AT ALL. Other scenes in that movie & other films are the sameway as well. Again, it's a comedy drama. LOL@ the dissing skills of Tyler Perry.
"Not at all. Spike Lee actually does not do the same thing. He drops "A Spike Lee Joint" in his credits and one sheets and leaves it at that. That's self promotion. Perry has to put his name FIRST. Even over the title of the damn movie (which tells you what he thinks is more important
). And then, as the credits roll, his name is peppered throughout. He even gave himself top billing over Angela Basset in Meet the Browns. What kind of bullsh*t is that?
Look, talent speaks louder than self aggrandizement. Perry isn't promoting himself. He's masturbating to his own delusion of grandeur. He's like the P. Diddy of cinema. A great self promoter with minimal actual talent."LMAO, stop being in denial. In most of his trailers it stated "A Spike Lee Joint" it the same damn thing. WOW@P. Diddy having no talent. Diddy is an extremely talented dude......and I DONT EVEN LIKE HIS MUSIC, LMAO.
"
That doesn't even make sense. What does Blade 3 have to do with every Tyler Perry film being officially listed as Tyler Perry's...insert actual film title here...? If he thinks that he has to put his name in front of every one of his productions to make sure his audience knows that it's his and it's safe to attend, that shows that he has no actual faith in his audience."It does make perfect sense. We're talking about the reason why Medea name is listed in the title, despite not being the main star (I already explain the reason behind "Tyler Perry Present"). It's for other brand new characters to get shine off of Medea. Like with opening acts for big names like 50 cent & Jay-z. It could also be the original name of the play and those play goers want to see it in movie form.
"TP Fan #1: Hey girl, there's a new Madea movie staring this weekend. Want to go?
TP Fan #2: Ion't know chile. Is Tyler's name on it? I don't wanna see no movie with a bunch a' cussin' and stuff in it.
TP Fan #1: Girl it's Madea. Of course it's Tyler's. It's got incest and drug abuse in it but you know it ain't got no cussin' in it.
TP Fan #2: Well...I guess. You sure it's Tyler's movie?
TP Fan #1: Girl..."Now, this was useless^........
"Spike does act in many of his own films, but the difference is he doesn't feel the need to list the supporting character he plays over his actual lead character. Nor does he put his name first over the actual title of the movie. Spike promotes the movie. Perry promotes Perry. You seem to be a Tyler Perry 'Stan' so I guess you wouldn't have a problem with him acting in drag.
j/k"If it a "spike lee joint" then he is promoting himself just like Tyler Perry. Also here is a shocker for you: I liked Spike Lee movies more then Tyler Perry's.
"OK, now you're not even arguing logically.
Of course Brown isn't a happy go lucky slave. His character is a modern one, not one set in the 19th century. What Brown is though is a happy go lucky colored buffoon lifted directly from the exact same caricatures and stereotypes that Stepin Fetchit, etc were forced to play back in the early to mid 20th century. Here's the contradiction and hypocrisy with Perry fans; if Brown was created by a white writer/director, they would be, rightly so, screaming for blood. But since he was created and promoted by their boy Perry, it's OK. Absolute bullsh*t.
"Actually Halle Berry character in Monster Ball was a modern slave. No, there wouldn't be no huge outrage from blacks if a white person created him among with different type of blacks. Spawn & Afro Samurai are called demon & evil yet alot of black ppl didn't complain at all......and they were created by non-blacks.
"You've never seen School Daze? What?? To Netflix with you sir! Stat! You know that none of those personalities you just mentioned are actual actresses right? They've never appeared in Spike's, Daniels', or Perry's films. I'm just saying..."Dude, I am just showing you the difference between dark skin & brown skin women. Kelly Rowland ain't really an actress but she was in "Smart Guy." Dark Skin actresses: Jill Marie Jones, Camille Winbush, Naturi Naughton, Rutina Wesley, etc. The only reason I brought up this point about Spike Lee, is to show that he got fault with color issues as well. But, that doesn't make him & Tyler sell outs.
"So, now I'm really confused. Are you suggesting Spike should have made Jungle Fever, Do the Right Thing, and Malcolm X without whites?
How is that even possible? Are you kidding?"That is only problem I have Spike Lee films. It focus too much on white ppl being evil & not enuff about our world. Spike Lee could had black ppl in white faces being racist in those films, he could just talk about white being racist and not shown them. I can't believe u never thought of this...... also Jungle Fever should had never been made at all.
"Again, your post here doesn't even make contextual sense. What does that rant have to do with Perry, Boyd, Daniels, or Lee? Who's changing races? What does Waiting to Exhale/Kick-Ass/Friends have to do with anything? What are you talking about?"omg, do you even read your own stuff? Here what I was replying to:
"Spike has moved on from all black films because he has progressed as an artist. He still makes films with predominately black casts, but most black people nowadays don't live in some all chocolate vacuum. In that way, he mirrors reality. Many of us actually live and work in integrated spaces."You made up some dumb ass excuse on why Spike & other black film makers don't make all black cast movies & I reply to it. It's so simple to comprehend to what I am saying.
Sigh...What?

If seeing Storm in X-men is my main focus, that doesn't mean I think that is the main plot of the X-men series.
<i>"

"</i>
Did I ever called Spike Lee: stupid, useless, etc.

Noooooooo. I am just pointing out his faults as well. If Spike Lee complain about Tyler's color issues, stereotypes, etc. then imma point out Spike Lee's as well.
"Nope. Perry came in after Precious was already in the can. He had no creative influence over the final product. Thank God. Otherwise Precious would have ended with, like, Shemar Moore sweeping Precious off her feet and attending a church service to make everything wrap up nice, neat, and simple. Props to Perry for helping get the film to theatres though."Tyler Perry still produced it. You need to praise him for producing that sh*tty movie. And he shouldn't be a sell out to you, since he produced that film you love so much.
"Wait..
Since you're a Perry fan, shouldn't you be in love with Precious? Perry produced it and according to you, the man is above reproach and can do no wrong.
"Boy, can you comprehend & stop making sh*t up that I didn't say. I said Tyler Perry has color issues but isn't a sell out. But, hey you r a big fan of Precious & should be Tyler Perry biggest fan.
"Why? Because you think that Tyler Perry should be critic proof? Please.
"No, cause that Boyd is just hating. I never saw/read no piece praising Tyler Perry while insulting Spike Lee, John Singleton, etc.