Author Topic: Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War  (Read 1993 times)

Offline Reginald Hudlin

  • Landlord
  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 9864
    • View Profile
Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
« on: August 24, 2012, 09:30:59 pm »
HOLLYWOOD REPORTER:

Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
Apple successfully demonstrated at trial that its rival illicitly copied the intellectual property behind its smartphone devices
4:18 PM PDT 8/24/2012 by Eriq Gardner

A California jury has sided with Apple after a high-stakes trial to determine whether Samsung infringed iPhone and iPad patents and trademarks in creating and marketing its Galaxy devices. Deciding that Samsung stole intellectual property to create its popular smartphones, the jury rendered a stunning $1.05 billion verdict.

Apple originally estimated that Samsung should pay some $2.5 billion in damages for violating its intellectual property and diluting its marks. The trial has been closely watched because the outcome could impact the future of the all-important smartphone market.


In a verdict announced Friday afternoon, a San Jose jury found that Apple infringed patents on many features of smartphones, including the graphical interface, the bounce back, the tap and zoom and the design of the iPhone contours. The jury spared Samsung over a patent on Apple's design of the iPad.

But Samsung's infringements were declared by the jury to be "willful" on most of its patents, and Samsung "knew or should have known" it was causing its electronics divisions to infringe. The jury also agreed with Apple's contention that Samsung diluted its trade dress.

Samsung is likely to appeal.

At trial, Apple presented evidence of Samsung internal reports and e-mails showing that Apple products were clearly on the minds of those who had designed the Android-based Galaxy devices. Apple executives testified about confusion in the marketplace and wanted to punish Samsung by making the company hand over its Galaxy profits.

"Samsung was able to copy and incorporate the result of Apple's four-year investment in hard work and ingenuity -- without taking any of the risks," Apple attorney Harold McElhinny said in his closing arguments.

In response, Samsung brought forth its own employees responsible for designing the Galaxy. These witnesses testified that the company already was at work on many of the product features when Apple's popular line first came out. Samsung also cited so-called "prior art" and presented the evolution of many smartphone and tablet features as being natural.

"Rather than compete in the marketplace, Apple is seeking a competitive edge through the courtroom," Samsung attorney Charles Verhoeven said during his closing arguments. "Itís seeking to block its biggest and most serious competitor from even attending the game."

Samsung counterattacked Apple by alleging that its rival had violated Samsung's patents relating to high-speed data and sought nearly $400 million in damages, or about 2.4 percent of iPhone sales. A jury disagreed and declined to award any damages to Samsung.

The trial, which lasted about three weeks in a federal courtroom, was marked by heavy fighting on a number of procedural issues, from what evidence could be shown to the nine-person jury to the type of form that jurors were given to decide guilt and calculate damages. The situation got so contentious at one point that U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh exclaimed, "I don't trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom."

The judge's many rulings along the way in what some have called the "tech trial of the century" likely will be fussed over during an appeal.

The verdict marks the latest in a case that has surprised many by getting this far. Litigation with billions of dollars at stake rarely reaches a dramatic conclusion at trial. But Apple's late founder Steve Jobs apparently was "shocked" at the introduction of the Galaxy smartphone and confronted Samsung executives in 2010, according one Apple witness testifying in the case.

The development of smartphones and tablets has begun to revolutionize Hollywood, impacting the nature of content and the types of deals that govern the distribution movies and television shows. Apple executives testified that they knew the iPhone would be a huge success five years ago when it was developed as "Project Purple" because when work began, phones weren't functioning as good entertainment devices. When its products came out, Hollywood was so enraptured that it gave the company hundreds of millions of dollars in free product placement.


Offline Mastrmynd

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 8163
  • Check my new site www.top20takeover.VVCRadio.com
    • View Profile
    • http://arvellpoe.atspace.com/
Re: Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2012, 07:30:30 pm »
i'm on team Samsung!


Listen to my entertaining radio show, "The Takeover: Top 20 Countdown" at www.top20takeover.VVCRadio.com.

Right on to the real and death to the fakers!  Peace out!

Offline Hypestyle

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 5821
  • Intellectual Conqueror
    • View Profile
    • Hypestyle's Homebase
Re: Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2012, 08:38:35 pm »
i'm on team Samsung!

...what are their phones like?  My virgin LG Rumor Touch is screwing up on me.. the touch screen isn't responsive like it should be..
Be Kind to Someone Today.

Offline Battle

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 8795
  • M.A.X. Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2012, 01:57:40 am »
The jury were probably fans of Apple! ;D

Offline Kristopher

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 1229
    • View Profile
Re: Apple Wins $1 Billion Jury Verdict in Samsung Patent War
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2012, 07:28:59 am »
Apple-Samsung Case Won't Chang Things Anytime Soon
by Sean Captain, Managing Editor, TechNewsDaily27 August 2012 12:22 PM ET

To hear some news reports of the Apple-Samsung lawsuit outcome, it sounds as if anyone who doesn't get an iPhone will be stuck buying models sporting round or triangular screens with no icons. But in the short term, at least, shopping for smartphones now won't be different than it was last Thursday.
"Some of the devices [affected in the lawsuit] are old and may not be sold anymore," said William Stofega, who heads up wireless research at analyst firm IDC. Indeed, in the rapidly changing world of smartphones, the grinding legal process may always trail the rapid turnover of new models.

"The Samsung Galaxy S III is not on the list," noted Brad Akyuz, an analyst at rival firm NPD Connected Intelligence, referring to the company's new top-of-the-line smartphone that just hit the market in late June

And Stofega thinks that Samsung may be able to "design around" the items that Apple won patent protection for. The biggest of them, he thinks, is the design of icons, which should be an easy fix, although "it may not be the most artistically beautiful," he said. And if a judge rules it necessary, it would even be pretty easy to change the icons on current phones through a routine software update, Stofega believes.

Many of these issues are up in the air, however, until Judge Lucy Koh issues her injunction on September 20th, determining what actions Samsung has to take. The decision date, coincidentally, is the day before rumors say that the next iPhone will go on sale.

But whatever happens, it's more likely to affect Samsung than consumers, the analysts believe, since plenty of other companies sell smartphones. It may just mean that people turn to other makers of Android phones. While Samsung shares took a dive this morning those of fellow Korean smartphone maker LG went up slightly.