Now see mr moderator, my resident stalker isn't playing nice.
Sigh...
"Implication" is a loaded word and I didn't imply anything. Nowhere did I say everyone on here was anti anything but of course in your delusional obsession with me you need to make it look like that.
I remember what Maxine Shaw said and it was confirmed by someone else on here. I do remember her argument with a single poster but I do remember what she said about the board overall. Stop misremembering.
And you've responded to me more than barely on here and CBR...and always with the same vitriol...no one needs you to cut them a break. You're worked up in your feelings rants over someone you consider beneath you (yet you still get upset with yourself and respond) is just as amusing.
I use perfect English. And just because one can be "progressive" doesn't mean one can't be "street" when he needs to be. And when one uses over the top insults and words like you even the most progressive men will call someone out. Just because I'm "progressive" doesn't mean I can't and wouldn't slap you silly. Cause people are multi functional.
And uh...you know you didn't invent the word "projecting" right? And emperor doesn't need some obsessive dude who rides me like you speaking up for or protecting him.
Everything else is you as usual getting you tights in a wad over me. Move along since you can only be "hood" from a keyboard...and before you get yourself banned.
Cause lord knows you'd be lonely then.
Oh, stop with the passive-aggressive but nonetheless still fallacious (not to mention desperate) "Appeal to Authority", because you can't handle yourself and your transparent nonsense pointed out. Get your weight up and stop trying to cry to the mods to rescue you "Mr. E-Thuggin' Forums Warrior", who "can and would slap me silly." You only get the type of response that your nonsense deserves, which is filled with what you call vitriol.
Maxine's reasoning for her quitting was based off of her confrontation with the single person. She, unfortunately, tried to apply that logic and reasoning to the board in aggregate. Which was based off of her conversation with that single person, and wasn't really demonstrated by the other posters here. Since they weren't really commenting in a similar manner, or even talking about the contentious issue that she was discussing in thread where she left. Try posting with some integrity. Which you didn't show AT ALL when you tried to latch what Maxine said, about "Da Boyz Club up in hurr! U no like wimmenz!" to the mindset of people in this thread, because they want the titular character to be in the focus more.
And I never said that you invented the word projecting. Stupidly strawman a bit harder, why don't you?
But I'm done with this conversation between us, though. You're a joke, and I've more than made my point as to why you shouldn't be taken remotely serious. And because I know you have a penchant for making yourself out to be important and have no actual sense of scale/depth, "taking you serious" shouldn't be confused with me merely "replying to you period."
But as I'm said, you're a joke, whose gotten stale. So I'm ending this back and forth between us. But don't worry. Next time you step out of line and say something utterly stupid/dishonest, I'll be right back on you. I'm not going to stand by and watch as you slander the ideology of people here, just because they're not self-sacrificing for causes that barely support THEM in return.
Booshman, let me be VERY clear about one thing In regards to you and others on here that I didn't have time to post back to yesterday regarding you in particular and your erroneous points...and my arguments...and address WHY you've been called out before and on this obsessive beef you've had for years...unfortunately this will be a bit long because there's so MANY things consistently wrong and underhanded to point about in regards to your many misleading and self congratulating posts:
You haven't been annoying in the past or now because you actually "make a point" (you rarely do) or know what you're talking about or have any insight on anything nor have you been called out because of that. You actually keep proving yourself limited in comprehending what's been written and what's happening in the world around you...you ARE annoying because in your biased, personal, and rhetorical rants you rarely if ever ARGUE what was actually said, intentionally misrepresent what you say you've read, are disingenuous on what's being argued, and exaggerate or intentionally misinterpret points made by those who get you riled up (especially me) so that you can pretend your "calling them out" on superfluous arguments that were never made.
And then have the audacity to congratulate yourself on your BS and displays of nonsensical, rhetorical points that have nothing to do with what's actually been said.
That's what makes you annoying along with your personal beef from a keyboard that of course makes you emotionally biased in your posts and your actual intentions questionable while points are being made by you about things that were never said. Not that you're actually making a point, refuting anything, nor effectively calling someone out on anything.
No one needs to "handle themselves" with you...it just gets pointless and tiring because it becomes increasingly apparent that you're more into attacking someone because of your personal beef and
showing off to your 5 or so friends on a message board. And it seems to be all you have.
Example: please point out to me and others where I said EXACTLY that everyone on here is anti-LGBT or woman. Not that I "implied" it but where I said it. Because MOST of your rants are all about you calling out "implications" and what you "think" someone is saying...just like you "seem" to remember why Maxine Shaw left and what she said, but hardly ever are you calling out what was actually said or remembering what was posted.
I called out two posts on here, one saying that he hopes the two gay Dora die early on so he doesn't have to see them, another who said this doesn't belong in a black panther comic...to any honest and comprehensive reader this is NOT saying that they are concerned that the titular character is not in the forefront, but that they are uncomfortable with seeing this in this book...PERIOD. Emperor to his credit DID say the latter point along with his statement, but the statement still stands that he said, for quoted, that it does not belong here. That's two different things.
Nowhere in that did I directly say or even suggest that everyone on here is anti-LGBT or woman. I did suggest that many in the black community and mostly straight black men have not been as supportive at times of women's issues and LGBT issues and this isn't just me saying that but if you look at sites and read information or TALK to people outside of your norm, you'd see many black women and LGBT people saying it themselves.
The point about black women and LGBT characters still stands since you nor anyone in all honesty can say black LGBT or women are as visible in comics and now in movies and TV as black male characters in a patriarchal business. And no this isn't and never was said to be the fault of black men.
The Maxine Shaw argument you are very obviously interpreting it, as you do with most things, yet again, the way you choose to see it and are comfortable with. NOT what she actually said, and she did say it was a "sausage club" in here and mentioned misogyny. Since your point of view can't entirely be taken seriously due to your biased viewpoints and personal, non-objective beef, along with you trying to save face in front of your friends...I'll trust my own memory and that of my friend on here who remembers it correctly and without personal bias. And no, this isn't to say she said or thought the board was "anti-woman or LGBT" and I never said that, but she said what she said and it does go into the place being a boys club.
Also: please stop thinking so highly of yourself in that just because YOU say something or someone is a "joke" that makes it true. Anything that you find offensive or is critical of that pride you hold onto so dearly is a "joke"... It's an opinion and one that stands on shaky ground due to your obvious bias and the fact that you have yet to actually refute anything that was actually said by me. Everything you've mostly posted on this has been conjecture and what you "think" or wish to read into what is being said...nothing factual or technical or directly addressing the point but a misrepresented one exaggerated by you.
And the "coon-speak" that you do to try and make light of someone's point that is entirely your misrepresented and exaggerated version of what's being actually being said is more of an embarrassment to you and black people in general than it is to me. But continue.
Also, YOU pointed out me using the word "projecting" after you used it...so it's hardly a strawman argument but more a sarcastic quip pointing out the ridiculousness that you would even bring that up. Again, reading comprehension.
And lastly, dude, you'd know nothing about what feminist and LGBT causes include in their fights nor what they stand for since I'm betting you've never actually immersed yourself in them. These causes involve black women and LGBT black people who have been fighting against racism and for black men for a long time, which is why I listed For Harriet as an example to Emperor. You wouldn't know that of course because like most limited, frail masculinity ego dudes of your ilk, your pride keeps you in one socio-political circle. So please, don't speak ignorantly about what you don't know.
So of course, the convo between us is over because it never really started and was never a convo, just more of you showing off and being a diva refuting points that were never made and making counterpoints to things you've exaggerated due to your own obsessive bias and personal beef. Emperor and I had a convo despite it getting heated...this with you, as usual, was more about your narcissistic need to look like a "community hero" in front of your friends (just like on CBR) fighting against critical viewpoints and you refuting things that aren't even there.
And on HERE this BS might work. In the real world, in a world of people like Coates and Lamont Hills, you'd just be a overly reactionary and bitter rhetorical stereotype who rarely makes cohesive points while arguing with things that aren't even there with yet again, a personal beef. An obsessive bias and need to make yourself look important in front of a few peeps on a board. Just like over at CBR.
So please, come for me the next time or whenever I "step out of line", because you have yet to put me back in it especially when you never actually argue anything factual or what was actually said by me, only what you choose to read into, intentionally misrepresent, and exaggerate for your own narcissistic need to pat yourself on the back and possibly look cool in front of 5 dudes on a message board. Cause whenever I choose, I'll be here and you can pleasure yourself yet again on this pathetic self flagellating obsession of yours.
Forget meeting up, because more than ever before on this thread, you've shown yourself to be a sad and limited little man needing to show off to the small base that is here. Hopefully some people on here find it entertaining.
To all else, thanks for any and all attention and to Emperor, despite that I heavily disagree with much of what you said and much I think was misinterpreted and despite where it got a little ugly...I enjoyed for the most part the exchange and glad if you actually did get anything out of it.
