Author Topic: Trumpís Energy, Low and Dirty  (Read 923 times)

Offline imchills

  • Assistant
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 682
    • View Profile
Trumpís Energy, Low and Dirty
« on: May 31, 2017, 05:19:43 am »
Quote
Donald Trump has two false beliefs about energy, one personal, one political. And the latter may send the world on a path to disaster.

On the personal side, Trump reportedly disdains exercise of any kind except golf. He believes that raising a sweat depletes the finite reserves of precious bodily fluids, I mean energy, that a person is born with, and should therefore be avoided.

Many years of acting on this belief may or may not explain the weird and embarrassing scene at the G-7 summit in Taormina, in which six of the advanced worldís leaders strolled together a few hundred yards through the historic city, but Trump followed behind, driven in an electric golf cart.

More consequential, however, is Trumpís false belief that lifting environmental restrictions ó ending the supposed ďwar on coalĒ ó will bring back the days when the coal-mining industry employed hundreds of thousands of blue-collar Americans.

Continue reading the main story

Paul Krugman
Macroeconomics, trade, health care, social policy and politics.
Itís All About Trumpís Contempt
MAY 26
The Unfreeing of American Workers
MAY 22
Whatís the Matter With Republicans?
MAY 19
The Priming of Mr. Donald Trump
MAY 15
Judas, Tax Cuts and the Great Betrayal
MAY 12
See More Ľ

RECENT COMMENTS

Eric 18 hours ago
Why should Trump agree to Article 5 until NATO starts paying up?Why should Trump agree to bogus climate science?If Dr. Krugman wants to...
Eli 18 hours ago
On November 8 2016, the biggest news was not the election of Donald John Trump as president of the US.The biggest news was that an oil...
Rev Wayne 18 hours ago
Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and too many Republicans are modern day Quacks (sellers of a fraudulent brew of anti-science) whose influence...
SEE ALL COMMENTS
How do we know that this belief is false? For one thing, coal employment began falling long before anyone was talking much about the environment, let alone global warming. In fact, coal jobs fell by two-thirds between 1948 and 1970, the year the Environmental Protection Agency was founded. This happened despite rising, not falling, coal production, mainly reflecting the replacement of old-fashioned pick-and-shovel mining with strip-mining and mountaintop removal, which require many fewer workers.

Itís true that in the past few years coal production has finally begun to fall, in part due to environmental rules. Mainly, however, coal is fading because of progress in other technologies. As one analyst put it last week, coal ďdoesnít really make that much sense anymore as a feedstock,Ē given the rapidly falling costs of cleaner energy sources like natural gas, wind and solar power.

Who was that analyst? Gary Cohn, chairman of the National Economic Council ó that is, Trumpís own chief economist. One wonders, however, whether heís expressed those views ó which pretty much represent the consensus among energy experts ó to the president.

There was a time, not that long ago, when advocating clean energy was widely considered an impractical, counterculture sort of thing. Hippies on communes might talk about peace, love and solar energy; practical people knew that prosperity was all about digging stuff up and burning it. These days, however, those who take energy policy seriously see a future that belongs largely to renewables ó and definitely not a future in which we keep burning lots of coal, let alone employ a lot of people digging it up.

But thatís not what voters from what used to be coal country want to hear. They enthusiastically backed Trump, who promised to bring those coal jobs back, even though his real agenda would punish those voters with savage cuts in programs they depend on. And Trump cares a lot more about public adulation than he does about serious policy advice.

Which brings me back to Trumpís European trip, which was remarkable not for what Trump did but for what he didnít do.

First, in Brussels, he declined to endorse NATOís Article 5, which says that an attack on any NATO member is an attack on all. In effect, he repudiated the central plank of Americaís most important alliance. Why, it was almost as if heís more interested in appeasing Vladimir Putin than he is in defending democracy.

Then, in Taormina, he was the only leader who refused to endorse the Paris climate accord, a global agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions that may be our last good chance to avoid catastrophic climate change. Why?

At this point, claims that trying to limit emissions would cause vast economic harm have lost all credibility: The same technological progress in alternative energy that is marginalizing coal would make the transition to a low-emissions economy far cheaper than anyone imagined a few years ago.

True, such a transition would accelerate the decline in coal. And thatís a reason to provide aid and new kinds of jobs for coal miners.

But Trump isnít offering coal country real help, just a fantasy about turning back the clock. This fantasy wonít last for long: In a couple of years it will be obvious, whatever he does, that the coal jobs arenít coming back. But the fantasy wonít even last that long if he goes along with the Paris accord.

So am I suggesting that the worldís most powerful leader might put the whole planetís future at risk so that he can keep telling politically convenient lies, which will soon be exposed in any case? Yes. If you find this implausible, you must not have been reading the news the past few months.

Now, maybe Trump wonít really pull the plug on Paris; or maybe heíll be gone from the scene before the damage is irreversible. But thereís a real possibility that last week was a pivotal moment in human history, the moment when an irresponsible leader sent the whole world careening off to hell in a golf cart.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/29/opinion/trump-g-7-summit-energy.html?smid=fb-share