Bob Lefsetz <email@example.com
Mar 27 (2 days ago)
So you're fifteen years old. You haven't got a driver's license, but you've got a computer, an iPad and an iPhone. Your parents insist you do well in school, you're on the advanced placement track. Worldly in a way your parents, no generation was at your age previously, you see that we live in a society of winners and losers, and you don't want the short end of the stick. So what do you do in your limited free time? Play the guitar? Sing in a band? Those odds are horrendous, almost no one succeeds, you're dependent on too many others, and success never lasts. No, you develop an app, you pursue your tech dreams.
People in the music business don't like this. They want you to believe the tunes are as good as they ever were, and if you challenge them, they say you're too old, you listened to crap too, like the Beatles, the Stones, Elton John... They want you to believe that Justin Timberlake is a national star. That what's on Top Forty is universal. That Justin Bieber is forever. They're delusional. The game has changed.
Once upon a time Top Forty radio was everything. It was your best friend. Want to know why it burgeoned? TRANSISTOR RADIOS! That was your heart's desire in the sixties, not an iPod, computers were something incomprehensible that filled whole rooms, you just wanted the tiny box that streamed your music via your best friend, the deejay. And when the Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan, all cheeky, having honed their wares for years, the whole nation went nuts, everybody picked up a guitar to get some of what they had, fame, riches, and sex. There are a lot easier ways to be rich, famous and get laid today, which is why the best and the brightest don't go into music.
The baby boomers sustained the business during the classic rock era, the early seventies, with FM and arena and stadium shows, but then the whole thing collapsed and was resuscitated by MTV and then the Internet blew a hole in the music business so wide that those still in it can't see it. The center is gone. The glue has melted away. Nothing SCALES!
Let's start with this week's big music business story. Justin Timberlake's sale of almost a million albums. At wholesale, that's not quite ten million dollars. David Bowie debuts with 85,000 albums, but this week he only sold 23,000, everybody who truly cares bought it, there's no virality. Bon Jovi's new album dropped by nearly 70% in its second week. If you think Bowie or Bon Jovi or even Justin Timberlake is going up from here, you're delusional.
Hell, the only person who went up from here was Adele. Whose album sold purely on its music, she disdained almost all hype, the audience embraced it, everybody knows it, it scaled.
The reason Summly sold for $30 million is because the potential audience is EVERYBODY! That's what musicians just don't get. They're still living in an antique universe wherein if you're anointed, you sell tonnage and get rich. Where exactly is that vehicle again? Radio is moribund and MTV plays no videos. There is no space program. Your only hope is to be the next Beatles, i.e. Adele, to create something undeniable, but all we've got is made by committee fads. Want to hear the next PSY record? NO, OF COURSE NOT! "Suit & Tie" was a radio stiff, like the initial Justin Bieber track from his new album, until the label muscled it up the chart. Justin Bieber is already over, he just doesn't know it yet. As for Mr. Timberlake... Do you expect multiple singles over the course of a year? Could happen, but reviews have been positively mediocre. Mr. Timberlake's success seems due to marketing prowess and likability. And that'll get you in the door, but it won't sustain you.
So we've got a disconnect. An industry that says piracy is bringing it to its knees when nothing could be further from the truth. Piracy is history in the music business. Why bother to steal when you can hear everything on YouTube for free? Sales suck because most people don't need the product, or want to spend their cash on something more desirable, like a data plan for their iPhone.
What we've got to confront is the old days are gone and may never come back. The reason "American Idol" worked is because it SCALED! You could reach the masses with something new, you could break...two acts. Kelly Clarkson and Carrie Underwood. After that, it was all about television, drama as opposed to music. Will there be another paradigm that blasts music to the top?
But where's the audience? The audience respects innovation and excellence, which is delivered constantly in tech, but is rare in music.
And where's the music?
We've got Adele at ten million, and then just about nobody else. Taylor Swift used to lead with her music, but now she's lost control of her career, it's about the tabloids as opposed to the tunes. And we all know soon Kim Kardashian will wake up with Kanye's kid and nobody will care, hell, her TV show's ratings are already tanking.
I'm not saying there are no good acts. I'm not saying you're not entitled to love new music. But I am saying that most acts playing today are clueless. They want to enter the space program, not realizing it's been dismantled. If you can't sing and your tunes are crummy, or esoteric, do you think everybody's gonna care?
OF COURSE NOT!
Festivals are the new radio. And festivals are bigger than any acts that appear. Festivals have scaled, but the acts have not. Isn't that interesting... It's more about the vibe at the show as opposed to any of the individual music. And what do we know about festivals? They're whored out to sponsors. Just like the acts. Everybody in the music business is a second class citizen. And the public knows it. Which undercuts the ability to scale.
So what you've got is a teenage Englander who sits at home and changes the world.
Isn't that what musicians used to do?
"He Has Millions and a New Job at Yahoo. Soon, He’ll Be 18.": http://nyti.ms/XCFm5G