Author Topic: IRON-MAN 2  (Read 22012 times)

Offline Open palm

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #45 on: May 07, 2010, 04:23:27 am »
Don't think for a moment Tony Stark gets less of the limelight.

Is this why they dumped Terrance Howard (heh heh heh) ?

Watch the movie today and find out.  ;)
Do you prefer a hero who will confirm your deepest fears? Or a hero who will inspire faith in humanity and goodness?

Offline Catch22

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
  • You gots to have vision, Willie!
    • View Profile
    • PapiCatch22's Urban Suite
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2010, 12:21:07 pm »
Great movie, it picks up right where the first one ended and it gives you a similar feel.  Downey's Tony Stark, of course, is the star of the show and it's really evident that he was born to play the part.  The cast seems even more familiar with one another and the banter between Stark, Rhodey, Pepper and even Happy was natural.  War Machine was COOL AS HELL!!  But really, for the part James Rhodes played in this one (yes, it was a bit expanded from the original) Terrance Howard and Don Cheadle could be interchangeable, in my opinion. 

Mickey Rourke did his thing and I appreciated the fact that he took his role seriously and didn't chew up the scenery.  He was subtly and not so subtly menacing throughout the film.  I loved the bigger part they put in for Sam Jackson, this movie really sets the ground work for the upcoming Avengers movie.  Scarlett Johanssen's (sp?) Black Widow was great, I don't know how much of that was a stunt double and what was her, but she should definitely stick around for the Avengers movie.  Overall I'd have to give this one 4 out of 5 shell heads!


Offline isaiah_bradley

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 196
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2010, 02:30:09 pm »
it's an okay movie. the frist one was great.

Offline KIP LEWIS

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 5879
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2010, 05:53:16 pm »
Some spoilers


LIKED it, hated justin hammer--he was annoying, but somehow he worked.  Loved war machine and black widow.  1st movie is better, 2nd has better action.  Over all, LIKED it a lot.

All in all, I felt it was pretty much falls into what I'd call a real "comic book" movie, instead of a movie about a comic book hero.  That is, super-villain plots of revenge and hero in distress. 

Nice borrowed comicbook elements--Tony dying is something that has been happening to Tony throughout his comic career.  And like in the comics, likewise, Rhodes "took" his first armor when Tony was on his drunken binge.

Now the magic element; if it is what I think it is (adamantium?), it is setting the stage for Captain America--Tony just invented the metal cap's shield is made of. 

I would see this again.

Offline Rockscissorspaper

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #49 on: May 07, 2010, 05:58:57 pm »
Now the magic element; if it is what I think it is (adamantium?)

I doubt they can call it adamantium due to the X-flicks over at Fox.
HEY KIDS, (BUY MY) COMICS!! https://www.mythworldemedia.com/comics

Offline Catch22

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
  • You gots to have vision, Willie!
    • View Profile
    • PapiCatch22's Urban Suite
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #50 on: May 07, 2010, 09:14:18 pm »
I thought it was vibranium.  That's the first thing that came to mind when I saw it.  Having Cap's shield "aiding" in creating it solidified it for me.

Offline Jay

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #51 on: May 07, 2010, 09:45:16 pm »
Terrance Howard and Don Cheadle could be interchangeable, in my opinion.

really!!??

  
Scarlett Johanssen's (sp?) Black Widow was great, I don't know how much of that was a stunt double and what was her, but she should definitely stick around for the Avengers movie.  Overall I'd have to give this one 4 out of 5 shell heads!

I really loved Johanssen in this movie. She was very sexy with that red hair and her acting was also superb. 
"You're gonna go out, and look, for, a job. The word today is...'job'. Jay Oh Bee...y'hear me?"

Offline Jay

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #52 on: May 07, 2010, 09:47:58 pm »
I thought it was vibranium.  That's the first thing that came to mind when I saw it.  Having Cap's shield "aiding" in creating it solidified it for me.

I hope it wasn't vibranium, that closes the door on a black panther movie if it is.
"You're gonna go out, and look, for, a job. The word today is...'job'. Jay Oh Bee...y'hear me?"

Online Emperorjones

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 8269
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #53 on: May 08, 2010, 05:46:19 am »
I liked it, but I didn't love it. I liked the first IM film better.

What I did like about IM2:

-Cast. Of course the regulars but the new additions were good choices too, especially Mickey Rourke and Scarlett Johannsen. I wasn't expecting much from SJ, but I thought she handled her role pretty well. I was hoping she would speak with a Russian accent at least once, but as one of the other posters said, if she's a master spy she would probably speak flawless English. I did enjoy her fight scene toward the end. Could there be a Deadpool and Black Widow movie in the offing? That might be sweet. Garry Shandling was also great as the anti-Stark senator. I hope they bring him back.

-More action. The first IM didn't have enough action, enough of Iron Man in action, though I can understand since it was an origin film. IM2 ramped up the action and I thought that was a good thing. It was really cool to see War Machine and Iron Man kicking ass.

-FX were pretty top notch.

What I didn't care for regarding IM2:

-Hammer. I thought Rockwell did a good job with the material. He's good at playing the weasel, but the character was so wimpy. I was expecting him to freak out and attempt to harm Pepper at the end, but he just stood there, even after Pepper called the cops. Seems like he would've at least called his lawyer. From what I recall, the comic Hammer was much more ruthless and a worthy adversary. He pushed Tony over the brink. But I did like what one of the posters said about film Hammer being a buffoon, a failed attempt at trying to be Tony Stark. And Rockwell did convey the frustration and the envy of his character. His Hammer was good, but never good enough. And though he tried to be cool he never was.

-Vanko. As many felt, I thought Rourke was underused. He was good with what they gave him. However, I had misgivings about his character as soon as I heard that he would be a composite of Whiplash-Blacklash and Crimson Dynamo. I wish they had just made him the Crimson Dynamo straight up. I would've loved to see that armor design in the film. I think Vanko's motivation would've worked better for me, and it would've added more depth to his beef with Tony if Howard Stark had actually stolen the technology/ideas from Anton. That would've given his animus more resonance. Upon reflection, I think Whiplash was the wrong villain to use for this story. I think the Ghost would've been better.

-Skirting the alcoholism. I think it was a mistake not to focus on that, instead of the technology killing him part. And the Tony-Rhodey fight, 'intervention', was poorly done. I think I can see what they were trying to do, to show how Tony had become a danger to himself, but the way it was done, the cause was that he was just partying because he thought he was dying and not because of his alcoholism. So they never really had to address that.

The party/fight scene also got Rhodes into armor fast, but it didn't come off as believable to me. In fact, it felt rushed like Rhodes was itching to jump in the armor as soon as he got to the party. I guess Tony was 'giving' Rhodes the armor though that was implied later, but I didn't care for how he just took the armor and took it to the military, especially after Tony had explicitly told the Senate that the armor was his property. Seems like there would've been a legal issue there. I also don't see Rhodes, being his friend, going against Tony's express wishes like that. Or giving that type of weapon to the military especially when guys like Hammer could get their hands on it. I was hoping this plot would be the impetus for Rhodes to resign from the military. I believe he was ex-military in the comic when he became Iron Man and later War Machine anyway.

-Demon in a Bottle/Armor Wars-I guess both of these story lines were sort of used in IM2, which is a shame because I had hoped each would be used to better effect and each could be there own movie. Now its doubtful that either will be revisited.

-Plot: After the Senate hearing, it seemed like there was no real plot. Just a lot of different scenes strung together, with nothing really making the narrative cohesive. In the first film, Stane was moving things behind the scenes, his machinations were helping propel the movie to a conclusion. Here, Hammer was just sort of there and Rourke was holed up in a room with a bird for far too much in the film.

-Nick Fury: I didn't care for him all that much this time around. I can't put my finger on it, but he didn't feel like Nick Fury, like a high-ranking intelligence agent and isn't Ultimate Fury also a general? Perhaps he wasn't hard ass enough for my taste. I would've liked something more like Andre Braugher's general in Fantastic Four 2. Though on reflection, it was cool to see him and SJ together again. Brought back memories of the Spirit. It might be neat to do a SHIELD movie with him and SJ.

Offline Jay

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #54 on: May 08, 2010, 08:57:14 am »


-Nick Fury: I didn't care for him all that much this time around. I can't put my finger on it, but he didn't feel like Nick Fury, like a high-ranking intelligence agent and isn't Ultimate Fury also a general? Perhaps he wasn't hard ass enough for my taste. I would've liked something more like Andre Braugher's general in Fantastic Four 2. Though on reflection, it was cool to see him and SJ together again. Brought back memories of the Spirit. It might be neat to do a SHIELD movie with him and SJ.

I think the Ulimate/Movie Nick Fury is marvel's biggest mistake. I like Mr. Jackson don't get me wrong but I think the Original Fury was soo much better.
"You're gonna go out, and look, for, a job. The word today is...'job'. Jay Oh Bee...y'hear me?"

Offline KIP LEWIS

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 5879
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #55 on: May 08, 2010, 10:08:14 am »
<<Quote from: Emperorjones on Today at 05:46:19 AM-Nick Fury: I didn't care for him all that much this time around. I can't put my finger on it, but he didn't feel like Nick Fury, like a high-ranking intelligence agent>>

I'll tell you why;  he was too laid back.  Fury is burning intensity at all times; he smiles like Dirty Harry, ie, his lips may be smiling but not his eyes.  Even when he is relaxing, he's intense.  In this movie, he isn't intense;  SJ was more intense.

Offline D- Ruck

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #56 on: May 08, 2010, 04:17:44 pm »
<<Quote from: Emperorjones on Today at 05:46:19 AM-Nick Fury: I didn't care for him all that much this time around. I can't put my finger on it, but he didn't feel like Nick Fury, like a high-ranking intelligence agent>>

I'll tell you why;  he was too laid back.  Fury is burning intensity at all times; he smiles like Dirty Harry, ie, his lips may be smiling but not his eyes.  Even when he is relaxing, he's intense.  In this movie, he isn't intense;  SJ was more intense.

I like the laid back Ultimate Nick Fury.  The other Nick is just like you said, Dirty Harry, he's a boring archetypal hardass, I never really felt him that much.
"Playa Hatas

Elevate us

If you Cross Me

You'll Die"

Wise Lebron

Offline KIP LEWIS

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 5879
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #57 on: May 08, 2010, 06:28:13 pm »
<<I like the laid back Ultimate Nick Fury.  >>

Ult Nick Fury isn't laid back.  He's laser intensity.  Mace Windum is much closer to Ult Fury than Movie Fury.

Offline Open palm

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #58 on: May 08, 2010, 07:09:03 pm »
If the Red Skull were to appear in the Avengers movie, I want this to happen:

In Washington D.C., during a battle, a lobbyist turns to his friend,Senator Stern. He says,"thank you for all you help, senator". He puts his mask on. To everyone's surprise it's the Red Skull.

(Nice goosestepping, Stern.)
Do you prefer a hero who will confirm your deepest fears? Or a hero who will inspire faith in humanity and goodness?

Offline Jay

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Re: IRON-MAN 2
« Reply #59 on: May 08, 2010, 09:40:23 pm »
<<I like the laid back Ultimate Nick Fury.  >>

Ult Nick Fury isn't laid back.  He's laser intensity.  Mace Windum is much closer to Ult Fury than Movie Fury.

example? Please! :)
"You're gonna go out, and look, for, a job. The word today is...'job'. Jay Oh Bee...y'hear me?"