Dude, stop being in denial. You know she won that cause of the sex scene.

Dog, what are you, twelve? You don't actually believe that, do you?

Lee Daniels already have a track record of promoting white supremacy & I already said that Tyler Perry does have color issues. How doe the movie: "Precious" show the girl is the victim of white supremacy when only the light skin mixed ppl & that white teacher were helping her??
Repetition of an opinion doesn't make it a fact. We've shown that Perry has some type of color issues due to many of his casting choices. However you have yet to prove that Daniels promotes white supremacy. Does he also have color issues? Maybe. Casting strictly bi-racial heroes in Precious was puzzling. But Daniels' only other directorial effort was the little seen Shadowboxer with Cuba Gooding as the lead. Using Monster's Ball and Tennessee to try to "prove" your claim is weak as Daniels didn't write or direct either film.
It's a comedy dramas. They need comedy in there somewhere, unless it'll be all drama.
Nobody's saying his films shouldn't have comedic elements in them. Even the most tragedy filled life has light moments. The problem with Perry's films, particularly the ones with Madea or Brown in them, is that the humor is so broad and outrageous that it undercuts the heavy-handed drama of the rest of the film. Take Meet the Browns for instance. In it, he shows us the oldest son getting seduced by the streets and ultimately shot in the back. Then Perry shoehorns all of these slapstick antics of Brown and co. which ultimately dilute the main storyline. His comic relief characters don't fit. It's not like these are characters who get in a humorous line or two. Madea and Brown are full out clowns They're caricatures from stupid sitcoms, not fleshed out, fully realized characters. Perry's trying to jam a round peg into a square hole. A more talented writer/director could maybe make these contradictions work within the narrative, but Perry ain't that dude. LOL!
LMAO, ok now you just have a personal vendetta against the man. Spike Lee does the samething with "it's a spike lee joint." It called self promotion & to raise his status higher as a director/producer/actor.......aint nothing wrong with that. "Tyler Perry Present" his is "branding"... that's a smart business move & I love when black ppl brag about ourselves.
Not at all. Spike Lee actually does
not do the same thing. He drops "A Spike Lee Joint" in his credits and one sheets and leaves it at that. That's self promotion. Perry has to put his name FIRST. Even over the title of the damn movie (which tells you what he thinks is more important

). And then, as the credits roll, his name is peppered throughout. He even gave himself top billing over Angela Basset in Meet the Browns. What kind of bullsh*t is that?

Look, talent speaks louder than self aggrandizement. Perry isn't promoting himself. He's masturbating to his own delusion of grandeur. He's like the P. Diddy of cinema. A great self promoter with minimal actual talent.
So more people can see it. Like how Blade 3, wasn't really about Blade at all. Also it could be the name of the original play & Tyler want ppl who liked that play to watch the movie with the same name. Movie, music, etc. that we don't like will always be dishonest in our opinions.

That doesn't even make sense. What does Blade 3 have to do with every Tyler Perry film being officially listed as Tyler Perry's...insert actual film title here...? If he thinks that he has to put his name in front of every one of his productions to make sure his audience knows that it's his and it's safe to attend, that shows that he has no actual faith in his audience.
TP Fan #1: Hey girl, there's a new Madea movie staring this weekend. Want to go?
TP Fan #2: Ion't know chile. Is Tyler's name on it? I don't wanna see no movie with a bunch a' cussin' and stuff in it.
TP Fan #1: Girl it's Madea. Of course it's Tyler's. It's got incest and drug abuse in it but you know it ain't got no cussin' in it.
TP Fan #2: Well...I guess. You sure it's Tyler's movie?
TP Fan #1: Girl...
From the movie trailers saying it "magical, wonderful, experience" to the rapper saying "its his best work since his first album".... and us completely disagreeing with those statements will be dishonest TO US. I don't know why Tyler Perry choose to act in drag. Maybe he thought it was funnier that way. But, I really don't know why and I don't see any problem with him acting in drag. Also, Spike Lee starred in his own films as well.
Spike does act in many of his own films, but the difference is he doesn't feel the need to list the supporting character he plays over his actual lead character. Nor does he put his name first over the actual title of the movie. Spike promotes the movie. Perry promotes Perry. You seem to be a Tyler Perry 'Stan' so I guess you wouldn't have a problem with him acting in drag.

j/k
He is not a happy go lucky slave to white folk. He's just a stupid kind man that is a Deacon. That more Bojangles will ever be.
OK, now you're not even arguing logically.

Of course Brown isn't a happy go lucky slave. His character is a modern one, not one set in the 19th century. What Brown is though is a happy go lucky colored buffoon lifted directly from the exact same caricatures and stereotypes that Stepin Fetchit, etc were forced to play back in the early to mid 20th century. Here's the contradiction and hypocrisy with Perry fans; if Brown was created by a white writer/director, they would be, rightly so, screaming for blood. But since he was created and promoted by their boy Perry, it's OK. Absolute bullsh*t.

He had to fight to keep the whole cast black in his movies & tv shows. Hollywood wanted to add more white folks, Tyler Perry said no and did it his own way. He had to show and prove that black ppl & other races like black movies. Hollywood don't even acknowledge black consumers.
I'll give you that. Hollywood doesn't acknowledge Black consumers. That doesn't excuse Perry from talking down to us and lowering the collective expectation of Black audiences though.
Kyme is the only dark skin woman you mention & I never saw the film School Daze (so I am not gonna comment on it). The rest are brown skin. Dark skin: Kelly Rowland, Naomi Campbell,. Buffie The Body, etc. So, my point still stands. There need to more dark skin female leads like "How She Move."
You've never seen School Daze? What?? To Netflix with you sir! Stat! You know that none of those personalities you just mentioned are actual actresses right? They've never appeared in Spike's, Daniels', or Perry's films. I'm just saying...
And that is problem: white ppl getting pay by black to say niggar in films. Shoot, alot of white racist folks would love to do that. That my only pet peeve about those type of films. You can make a movie about racism without white ppl. You just need to be creative.
So, now I'm really confused. Are you suggesting Spike should have made Jungle Fever, Do the Right Thing, and Malcolm X without whites?

How is that even possible? Are you kidding?
LOL, progress as an artist? You don't need to change the race of your characters in order to progress. Fighting aliens in space? Becoming a superhero? You can still make them blacks. SINCE WHEN TV, VIDEOGAMES, MOVIES, EVER BEEN REALISTIC WITH RACES? Look at "Friend", "Kick-Ass", tons of tons of white stuff. Why can't black movies be the same way?? That why 'Waiting To Exhale" was such a huge success. It was a different black book, cause it wasn't about white ppl being evil.
Again, your post here doesn't even make contextual sense. What does that rant have to do with Perry, Boyd, Daniels, or Lee? Who's changing races? What does Waiting to Exhale/Kick-Ass/Friends have to do with anything? What are you talking about?
Boy, when did I ever said that? Don't put words in my mouth & BOYD knew that him dissing Tyler Perry would get his stuff more media attention. Boyd dissing Tyler was MY MAIN FOCUS.
Sigh...
Not really, if I am writing how wonderful Spike Lee is, I wouldn't insult any other black directors along the way. I brought up Spike Lee cause he was dissing Tyler Perry as well. Boyd, knows that him dissing Tyler Perry would the the highlight of his writing. And I am tired of black hollywood tearing each other down.

My point still stand about Tyler Perry. I guess you're now a Tyler Perry fan since he produced a movie you're sticking up for.
Nope. Perry came in after Precious was already in the can. He had no creative influence over the final product. Thank God. Otherwise Precious would have ended with, like, Shemar Moore sweeping Precious off her feet and attending a church service to make everything wrap up nice, neat, and simple. Props to Perry for helping get the film to theatres though.
Wait..
Since you're a Perry fan, shouldn't you be in love with Precious? Perry produced it and according to you, the man is above reproach and can do no wrong.
Boyd shouldn't had mention Tyler Perry name at all.
Why? Because
you think that Tyler Perry should be critic proof? Please.
