Author Topic: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4  (Read 428 times)

Offline Reginald Hudlin

  • Landlord
  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
    • View Profile
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« on: December 28, 2011, 09:23:05 AM »
from THE TALL GUY'S GEAR GUIDE:

Kudos to Cruise

Tom Cruise has had it rough over the last few years, ultimately being toppled from his perch as the biggest movie star in the world after an almost twenty year reign.


Due to his Scientologist beliefs and sometimes bizarre behavior, Cruise became almost a pariah, but still a pariah who commanded 20 million dollar paydays.  His last few films, 'Valkyrie' and 'Knight and Day' (which is an unappreciated, satisfyingly funny action comedy) failed to measure up to Cruise's glory days, while the third 'Mission Impossible' film was the lowest grosser of the series, which still amassed a worldwide gross of 1.4 billion dollars.


While he may not be as big as he once was, Cruise works hard for the money and never phones it in.  He's never taken his audience for granted and goes to great extremes to see that they get their money's worth.  His latest film, 'Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol', showcases Cruise's willingness to do outrageous stunts in the name of realism.  Dude works hard for the money, as this featurette on the still physically fit superstar's climb (and leap) from the highest building in the world (in Dubai) demonstrates.

 

'MI: Ghost Protocol' delivers the thrills.  It's action packed and hardly ever lets up. Cruise once again is agent Ethan Hunt, on the run with what's left of the IMF team as they race around the world to stop a madman from detonating a nuclear bomb in America.  There's not much fresh about the story, but noted animation director Brad Bird ('The Incredibles', 'Ratatouille' and 'The Iron Giant') attacks his first live action film like he's been doing it all of his life.  His stunt sequences are seamless, the pacing perfect and his actors all fit into the international intrigue, ably handling the action as well as the more light hearted tone of the film, but it's Cruise's movie star weight that is the glue that holds it all together.  Nearing 50, Cruise has the confidence to be generous with his fellow actors, resulting in this fourth 'MI' adventure being the first one that really felt like there was a team onscreen, instead of a superstar and his supporting cast.



'Fast Five' was the most over the top (but effective) popcorn blockbuster I had seen this year, but 'MI:GP' is right there with it.  Cruise had the idea over 15 years ago to turn the classic television show into a film franchise and has hand picked every director that has helmed one of the films, allowing them all to put their own personal touch on their movie.  Brian DePalma, John Woo and JJ Abrams directed the first three films, respectively, but Cruise's most impressive hire has got to be Bird.  To entrust this global brand to a man who had never directed a live action film before is the biggest stunt of all, but like his character, Cruise always seems to find a way to win, when it comes to 'Mission Impossible'.


Offline michaelintp

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 441
    • View Profile
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 04:25:34 PM »
Just saw it.  Seemed rather formulaic to me.  One action sequence after the next, thin plot, shallow characters. Yes, another boring Russian bad guy.  Paula Patton is the high point, visually, in a very physically fit sort of way, though the film also boasts extensive travel footage of destinations around the world. Like in old James Bond movies, some nifty gadgets are displayed that are interesting for about five minutes. While it has gotten good reviews, these constant-action kind of films start to put me to sleep after a while.  Chase chase chase, run run run, boom boom boom.  Maybe I'm just getting old, haha.

A couple of things didn't make a great deal of sense to me.  SPOILER ALERT: At the end when Tom is chasing the villainous mastermind, why Tom didn't just take a gun with him to pop the guy in the head and take the suitcase mystified me.  Except then you would not have the long drawn-out fight scene in the automated parking lot.  The other thing that seemed odd to me was that the good guys were able to take out the flying missile's nuclear warhead when it was like 200 feet from San Francisco, a couple seconds from detonation, yet U.S. defensive measures were nowhere in sight, nor was there any hint that the President had launched a counter-strike even though it appeared that S.F. was about to become history. The lack of both must have reflected the prudent restraint and cost-saving streamlining military cuts of the Obama Administration, haha.  Also, er, I thought nuclear warheads are detonated in the air a significant distance above a city, to maximize damage and casualties.  Yet this dang thing was turned off right before it hit the doggone bridge.  Arghhhh.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2012, 09:12:15 PM by michaelintp »

Offline The Griot

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
    • View Profile
    • MVmedia
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2012, 06:17:44 AM »
I enjoyed it. I went in with the mindset that it was an action thriller and on that level it did its job. I just wish Ving Rhames had more than a cameo role. But I am a Tom Cruise fan. I thought Knight and Day was great, too.
"Happiness is dancing when the drumming is good."

Offline JLI Jesse

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 3446
  • We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
    • View Profile
    • Friends of the JLI
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2012, 07:42:18 AM »
I'm thinking about seeing this one since it seems to have gotten generally good reviews.  The first movie just ruined the entire franchise for me.  Making Jim Phelps, the team leader in both TV series, the villain and then killing him really annoyed me and it made no sense.  I would have rather them just made Cruise's character Phelps.

Offline Reginald Hudlin

  • Landlord
  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
    • View Profile
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2012, 09:48:36 AM »
I am a big Brad Bird fan so this was a must see for me.  But I thought Tom Cruise really reaffirmed why he's a big star.  Simon Pegg was brilliant and Paula Patton was also great.  I had a great time.  I hear Mike's objections but I looked at more like a live action cartoon than a "film".

Offline Curtis Metcalf

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
  • One never knows, do one?
    • View Profile
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2012, 11:53:34 AM »
I'm thinking about seeing this one since it seems to have gotten generally good reviews.  The first movie just ruined the entire franchise for me.  Making Jim Phelps, the team leader in both TV series, the villain and then killing him really annoyed me and it made no sense.  I would have rather them just made Cruise's character Phelps.

I liked that turn of events. Made the movies a real spin-off of the TV series instead of a rehashing of it.
Seek first to understand, then to be understood.

Offline Emperorjones

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
    • View Profile
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2012, 03:54:47 PM »
Pretty good film, though not as good as the third one. I thought the villain wasn't good enough. Also, Jeremy Renner didn't bring much too it. He was too much of a comic relief type character to conceivably take over for Cruise, which is what I heard they were possibly setting up. Renner and Simon Pegg did have nice comic chemistry though.

Offline Hypestyle

  • Honorary Wakandan
  • *****
  • Posts: 4173
  • Intellectual Conqueror
    • View Profile
    • Hypestyle's Homebase
Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 4
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2012, 08:32:34 PM »
just saw it.  great stuff-- especially ms. patton.  I'm disappointed that V. Rhames wasn't part of the action, but at least they didn't kill him off..